Remembering Camelot & JFK

[michelle]

November 22, 1963, will we ever forget that day?

I'm Irish Catholic, a "Mick." Yesterday, November 22, as I do every year, I spent the day reflecting on our President Kennedy. I share the memories I have, and the many pictorial history books I own of JFK with my son.

There's not a single person in the United States, if they're old enough, who can't remember where they were and what they were doing when they heard that the President was shot 42 years ago.

I remember sitting at my desk in kindergarten, a man walked in the classroom, whispered into my teacher's ear, she began sobbing and put her head down in her arms continuing to cry until she composed herself enough to tell us, "Children, President Kennedy has been shot!"

I also remember watching his heartbreaking funeral at my Gram's house. I still can't watch it without crying. Who doesn't shed a tear when little John John saluted his father's coffin as it went by?

Do you remember the pain and grief most Americans felt at this time? And every year there has been some type of commemoration of the assassination of JFK. That is until the Bush administration stole the presidency. Why? Because there was true love and fondness for John F. Kennedy; we adored his family, Jacqueline, Caroline, and John, Jr. The Bush administration hates the hope and inspiration JFK brought to this country! They are the antithesis of what JFK meant to us. The Bush administration has led us down a spiral of doom and despair. Some legacy that is to leave behind in the history books.

A few days after President Kennedy's funeral Jacqueline, trying to recall her husband's favorite quotations, said that there were many from the classics, but the words that came back to her most often were from a song in the musical comedy, 'Camelot': "DON'T LET IT BE FORGOTTEN, THAT ONCE THERE WAS A SPOT, FOR ONE BRIEF SHINNING MOMENT, THAT WAS KNOWN AS CAMELOT." Yea, for many, the 35 months of Kennedy's administration were remembered as a kind of brief and shinning Camelot......

Michelle

The first family

John F. Kennedy Jr. was born on Thanksgiving Day -- November 25, 1960 -- in Washington. He was the first child ever born to a U.S. president-elect.

In this family portrait, John sits in the president's lap, the father he hardly knew.

tinyurl.com/cw4rq

[michelle]

NOTE: I have hesitated posting this type of information in the past, but with all the cracks forming in the "Truth Dam" I figured now's as good a time as any. For God's sake, for our own sake, start looking at the Federal Reserve and who runs it. If you find it hard to believe that the puppet masters behind the nation of Israel had anything to do with the assassination of JFK, consider the following:

On April 1st, 1951 the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency the Mossad, which will go on to terrorize the world, is formed. The motto of the Mossad is probably the most disgusting secret service motto in the world, it is:
"By Way Of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War."

On June 4th, 1963 President John F. Kennedy (the 35th President of the United States 1961 – 1963) signs Executive Order 11110 which returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Rosthchilds owned Federal Reserve.

Less than 6 months later on November 22nd , president Kennedy is assassinated by the Rothschilds for the same reason as they assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, he wanted to print American money for the American people, as oppose to for the benefit of a money grabbing war mongering foreign elite.

This Executive Order 11110, is rescinded by President Lyndon Baines Johnson (the 36th President of the United States 1963 to 1969) on Air Force One from Dallas to Washington, the same day as President Kennedy was assassinated.

Another, and probably the primary, reason for Kennedy's assassination is however, the fact that he made it quite clear to Israeli Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, that under no circumstances would he agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state. The Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz on February 5, 1999, in a review of, Avner Cohen's book, "Israel and the Bomb," states the following,
"The murder of American President John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on the government of Israel to discontinue the nuclear program...The book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option."

Mossad And The JFK Assassination

"Israel need not apologize for the assassination or destruction of those who seek to destroy it. The first order of business for any country is the protection of its people."
Washington Jewish Week, October 9, 1997

Considering that the Mossad is quite possibly the most ruthless and efficient intelligence agency in the world, it is peculiar that they have never been scrutinized in relation to the Kennedy assassination, especially when practically every other entity in the world (short of Elvis impersonators) has been implicated. But that all changed in January, 1994 with the release of Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment. In this book, Piper says, "Israel's Mossad was a primary (and critical) behind the scenes player in the conspiracy that ended the life of JFK. Through its own vast resources and through its international contacts in the intelligence community and in organized crime, Israel had the means, it had the opportunity, and it had the motive to play a major frontline role in the crime of the century - and it did."

Their motive? Israel's much touted Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, who ruled that country from its inception in 1948 until he resigned on June 16, 1963, was so enraged at John F. Kennedy for not allowing Israel to become a nuclear power that, Collins asserts, in his final days in office he commanded the Mossad to become involved in a plot to kill America's president.

Ben-Gurion was so convinced that Israel's very survival was in dire jeopardy that in one of his final letters to JFK he said, "Mr. President, my people have the right to exist, and this existence is in danger."

In the days leading up to Ben-Gurion's resignation from office, he and JFK had been involved in an unpublicized, contentious debate over the possibility of Israel getting nuclear capabilities. Their disagreement eventually escalated into a full-fledged war of words that was virtually ignored in the press. Ethan Bronner wrote about this secret battle between JFK and Ben-Gurion years later in a New York Times article on October 31, 1998, calling it a "fiercely hidden subject." In fact, the Kennedy/Ben-Gurion conversations are still classified by the United States Government. Maybe this is the case because Ben-Gurion's rage and frustration became so intense - and his power so great within Israel - that Piper contends it was at the center of the conspiracy to kill John Kennedy. This stance is supported by New York banker Abe Feinberg, who describes the situation as such: "Ben-Gurion could be vicious, and he had such a hatred of the old man [Joe Kennedy, Sr., JFK's father]." Ben-Gurion despised Joe Kennedy because he felt that not only was he an anti-Semite, but that he had also sided with Hitler during the 1930's and 40's. [We will touch upon this aspect of the story in an upcoming article entitled The CIA and Organized Crime: Two Sides of the Same Coin].

Anyway, Ben-Gurion was convinced that Israel needed nuclear weapons to insure its survival, while Kennedy was dead-set against it. This inability to reach an agreement caused obvious problems. One of them revolved around Kennedy's decision that he would make America his top priority in regard to foreign policy, and not Israel! Kennedy planned to honor the 1950 Tripartite Declaration which said that the United States would retaliate against any nation in the Middle East that attacked any other country. Ben-Gurion, on the other hand, wanted the Kennedy Administration to sell them offensive weapons, particularly Hawk missiles.

The two leaders thus engaged in a brutal letter exchange, but Kennedy wouldn't budge. Ben-Gurion, obsessed by this issue, slipped into total paranoia, feeling that Kennedy's obstinance was a blatant threat to the very existence of Israel as a nation. Piper writes, "Ben-Gurion had devoted a lifetime creating a Jewish State and guiding it into the world arena. And, in Ben-Gurion's eyes, John F. Kennedy was an enemy of the Jewish people and his beloved state of Israel." He continues, "The 'nuclear option' was not only at the very core of Ben-Gurion's personal world view, but the very foundation of Israel's national security policy."

Ben-Gurion was so preoccupied with obtaining nuclear weapons that on June 27, 1963, eleven days after resigning from office, he announced, "I do not know of any other nation whose neighbors declare that they wish to terminate it, and not only declare, but prepare for it by all means available to them. We must have no illusions that what is declared every day in Cairo, Damascus, and Iraq are just words. This is the thought that guides the Arab leaders … I am confident … that science is able to provide us with the weapons that will serve the peace and deter our enemies."

Avner Cohen, in Israel and the Bomb, published by Columbia University Press, reinforces this sense of urgency by writing, "Imbued with lessons of the Holocaust, Ben-Gurion was consumed by fears of security … Anxiety about the Holocaust reached beyond Ben-Gurion to infuse Israel's military thinking." He further adds fuel to this point by pointing out, "Ben-Gurion had no qualms about Israel's need for weapons of mass destruction," and "Ben-Gurion's world view and his decisive governing style shaped his critical role in instigating Israel's nuclear progress."

Kennedy, on the other hand, was adamant in his refusal to promote Israel's ascension to the nuclear stage. Avener Cohen, in Israel and the Bomb, stresses, "No American president was more concerned with the danger of nuclear proliferation than John Fitzgerald Kennedy. He was convinced that the spread of nuclear weapons would make the world more dangerous and undermine U.S. interests." Cohen continues at the end of this passage, "The only example Kennedy used to make this point was Israel."

Realizing that Kennedy would not change his mind, Ben-Gurion decided to join forces with Communist China. Both countries were greatly interested in creating nuclear programs, and so began their secret joint dealings. Working in unison through intermediary Shaul Eisenberg, who was a partner of Mossad gun-runner and accountant Tibor Rosenbaum, Israel and China proceeded to develop their own nuclear capabilities without the knowledge of the United States.

If you find this scenario improbable, I strongly urge you to read Gordon Thomas' excellent book, Seeds of Fire, where he exposes how the Mossad and CSIS (Chinese secret service) have conspired on many occasions to not only steal American military secrets, but to also doctor U.S. intelligence programs such as the Justice Department's PROMISE software. This instance, I am afraid to say, is but the first where echoes of the JFK assassination can still be felt today reverberating through our post 9-11 world. The danger of Israel developing the Bomb in unison with China became a highly volatile situation, and was closely monitored by the CIA.

Intent on pursuing this path, the Israeli's constructed a nuclear facility at Dimona. When Kennedy demanded that the U.S. inspect this plant, Ben-Gurion was so incensed that he erected another PHONY facility that held no evidence of nuclear research and development. (Does this scenario sound eerily familiar to the game we're playing with Saddam Hussein in Iraq right now?) Fully aware of their shenanigans, though, JFK told Charles Bartlett, "The sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability."

Avner Cohen, in Israel and the Bomb, reiterates this claim by saying that Ben-Gurion had taken the nuclear issue so closely to heart that he, "concluded that he could not tell the truth about Dimona to American leaders, not even in private."

Dr. Gerald M. Steinberg, political science professor at Bar-Ilan University's BESA Center for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv, weighs in by saying, "Between 1961 and 1963, the Kennedy administration placed a great deal of pressure on Ben-Gurion in the effort to pressure for acceptance of international inspection of Dimona and Israeli abdication of their nuclear weapons. This pressure apparently did not alter Israeli policy, but it was a contributing factor to Ben-Gurion's resignation in 1963."

To convey how serious this situation had become in modern terms, look at what is happening in Iraq with United Nations security teams inspecting the royal palaces and bunkers for nuclear weapons and materials. This matter is so urgent that our nation is on the verge of war. Forty years earlier, the heat that JFK was placing on Ben-Gurion was equally as strong as what George Bush is laying on Saddam Hussein today.

In Israel and the Bomb, Avner Cohen reinforces this point. "To force Ben-Gurion to accept the conditions, Kennedy exerted the most useful leverage available to an American president in dealing with Israel: a threat that an unsatisfactory solution would jeopardize the U.S. government's commitment to, and support of, Israel."

The pressure on Ben-Gurion was so immense that he ended up leaving office. But Kennedy, in true pit-bull style, didn't let up on Ben-Gurion's successor, Levi Eshkol, as Avner Cohen reports. "Kennedy told Eshkol that the U.S. commitment and support of Israel 'could be seriously jeopardized' if Israel did not let the U.S. obtain 'reliable information' about its efforts in the nuclear field. Kennedy's demands were unprecedented. They amounted, in effect, to an ultimatum." Cohen concludes this thought by asserting, "Kennedy's letter precipitated a near-crisis situation in Eshkol's office."

In the end, as we're all aware, Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963; but less known is that China conducted its first nuclear test in October, 1964. What makes this event more profound is Piper's claim that even though Israel said its first nuclear tests took place in 1979, they actually occurred in October, 1964 along with the Chinese! If this is true, other than August, 1945 when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, October 1964 may possibly be the most dangerous month in 20th century history.

Let's return, though, to JFK's assassination and the direct results of it in regard to the Jewish lobby, American foreign policy, and the militarization of Israel. To understand how powerful the Israeli lobby is in this country, venerable Senator J. William Fulbright told CBS Face the Nation on April 15, 1973, "Israel controls the U.S. Senate. The Senate is subservient, much too much; we should be more concerned about U.S. interests rather than doing the bidding of Israel. The great majority of the Senate of the U.S. - somewhere around 80% - is completely in support of Israel; anything Israel wants; Israel gets. This has been demonstrated time and again, and this has made [foreign policy] difficult for our government."

Do you hear what Senator Fulbright said? This isn't a crazy conspiracy theorist or a KKK anti-Semite. It's a much-respected U.S. Senator saying that about 80% of the Senate is in Israel's hip pocket. Adding clout to this argument is Rep. Paul Findley, who was quoted in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs in March, 1992, "During John Kennedy's campaign for the presidency, a group of New York Jews had privately offered to meet his campaign expenses if he would let them set his Middle East policy. He did not agree … As the president, he provided only limited support of Israel."

To understand how important Kennedy's decisions were during his short-lived presidency, we need to look at the issue of campaign finance. Considering how influential the Israeli lobby is in the U.S. Senate (hearkening back to the words of Senator Fulbright), they had to have been enraged when President Kennedy genuinely wanted to cut the knees out from under the current campaign finance methods because it made politicians so reliant upon the huge cash inlays of special-interest groups. Regrettably, Kennedy did not have the time to implement this program, and to this day our political system is still monopolized by lobbyists from the very same special-interest groups. One can only imagine what changes would have occurred in regard to our foreign policy had Kennedy eradicated these vipers and blood-suckers from the halls of Congress.

Tragically, Kennedy's ideas never came to fruition, and his heated battle with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion over whether Israel should be allowed to develop a nuclear program was ultimately lost. The reason why is that Lyndon Baines Johnson, who Kennedy intended to drop from his ticket in 1964 due to his extreme dislike for, had a complete reversal in foreign policy. As you will see, not only did Israel's nuclear program move ahead unchecked; they also became the primary beneficiary of our foreign aid.

But this absolute turnaround would not have occurred if Kennedy would not have been assassinated. Up until LBJ became president, Kennedy dealt with the Middle East in a way that most benefited the U.S. His primary goal - and one which would most keep the peace - was a balance of power in the Middle East so that each and every nation would be secure. This decision adhered to the Tripartite Declaration which the U.S. signed in 1950. But under the Johnson administration, this fragile balance was overturned, and by 1967 - only four years after Kennedy's assassination - the U.S. was Israel's main weapons supplier, and OUR best interests were put well behind those of Israel!

As Michael Collins Piper writes: "The bottom line is this: JFK was adamantly determined to stop Israel from building the nuclear bomb. LBJ simply looked the other way. JFK's death did indeed prove beneficial to Israel's nuclear ambitions and the evidence proves it."

Reuven Pedatzer, in a review of Avner Cohen's Israel and the Bomb, in the Israeli Newspaper Ha'aretz on February 5, 1999 wrote, "The murder of American president John F. Kennedy brought to an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by the U.S. administration on the government of Israel to discontinue their nuclear program." He continues, "Kennedy made it quite clear to the Israeli Prime Minister that he would not under any circumstances agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state." Pedatzer concludes, "Had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option," and that, "Ben-Gurion's decision to resign in 1963 was taken to a large extent against the background of the tremendous pressure that Kennedy was applying on him concerning the nuclear issue."

If you're still not convinced; how about some numbers? In Kennedy's last fiscal budget year of 1964, Israeli aid was $40 million. In LBJ's first budget of 1965, it soared to $71 million, and in 1966 more than tripled from two years earlier to $130 million! Plus, during Kennedy's administration, almost none of our aid to Israel was military in nature. Instead, it was split equally between development loans and food assistance under the PL480 Program. Yet in 1965 under the Johnson administration, 20% of our aid to Israel was for the military, while in 1966, 71% was used for war-related materials.

Continuing in this same vein, in 1963 the Kennedy administration sold 5 Hawk missiles to Israel as part of an air-defense system. In 1965-66, though, LBJ laid 250 tanks on Israel, 48 Skyhawk attack aircrafts, plus guns and artillery which were all offensive in nature. If you ever wondered when the Israeli War Machine was created, this is it! LBJ was its father.

According to Stephen Green in Taking Sides: America's Secret Relations with a Militant Israel, "The $92 million in military assistance provided in fiscal year 1966 was greater than the total of all official military aid provided to Israel cumulatively in all the years going back to the foundation of that nation in 1948."

Green continues, "70% of all U.S. official assistance to Israel has been military. America has given Israel over $17 billion in military aid since 1946, virtually all of which - over 99% - has been provided since 1965."

Can you see what's happening here? Within two years of JFK's assassination, Israel went from being a weak, outmatched member of the volatile Middle Eastern community that was not allowed to develop nuclear weapons to one that was well on its way to becoming a undeniable military force on the world stage. John Kennedy adamantly put his foot down and refused to allow Israel to develop a nuclear program, while LBJ bent over backward to facilitate and bolster them. Or, as Seymour Hersh wrote in The Samson Option, "By 1968, the president had no intention of doing anything to stop the Israeli bomb."

The result of this shift in focus from the Kennedy to Johnson administration is, in my opinion, the PRIMARY reason behind our current troubles in the Middle East which culminated in the 9-11 attacks and our upcoming war with Iraq (and beyond). I have a great deal of confidence in this statement, for as Michael Collins Piper points out, here are the results of John F. Kennedy's assassination:

1) Our foreign and military aid to Israel increased dramatically once LBJ became president.

2) Rather than trying to maintain a BALANCE in the Middle East, Israel suddenly emerged as the dominant force.

3) Since the LBJ administration, Israel has always had weaponry that was superior to any of its direct neighbors.

4) Due to this undeniable and obvious increase in Israel's War Machine, a constant struggle has been perpetuated in the Middle East.

5) LBJ also allowed Israel to proceed with its nuclear development, resulting in them becoming the 6th largest nuclear force in the world.

6) Finally, our huge outlays of foreign aid to Israel (approximately $10 billion/year when all is said and done) has created a situation of never-ending attacks and retaliation in the Middle East, plus outright scorn and enmity against the U.S. for playing the role of Israel's military enabler.
In Israel's, and especially David Ben-Gurion's eyes then, what were their alternatives - to remain weakened (or at least balanced) in relation to their neighbors and handcuffed by JFK's refusal to bow to their will, or KILL the one man standing in their way to becoming dominant in the Middle East, the recipient of huge amounts of military aid, and one of the premier nuclear forces in the world? It's something to think about. Also, while these thoughts are running through your head, ask yourself this question. If Kennedy, LBJ, and all subsequent administrations would have adhered to the 1950 Tripartite Declaration and did everything in their power to maintain balance in the Middle East instead of pushing Israel to the forefront, would our Towers have been attacked on 9-11, 2001, and would we be on the verge of a possibly catastrophic war today? It's certainly something to ponder.

Also see:

Israel Killed JFK, Alleges Vanunu
A spokesman for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, discredited this statement by Vanunu after his release from prison.
SNIP:July 26, 2004 14:27 IST
In a startling accusation, nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu has alleged that Jerusalem was behind the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy, who was exerting pressure on the then Israeli head of state to shed light on the Dimona nuclear plant.
Read the rest: www.rediff.com/news/2004/jul/26vanunu.htm

Michael Collins Piper's The Final Judgment
www.serendipity.li/zionism/final_jgmt_reviews.htm

[michelle]

John F. Kennedy vs The Federal Reserve

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

"United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:

1) war (Viet Nam); and,

2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.


Executive Order 11110

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963


Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:

Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:

EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;

EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;

EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;

EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;

EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617

The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.

The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors".

The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:

"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)".

The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".

Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!

No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".

Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.

The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"

Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.

Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".

In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,

Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:

"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."

In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.

This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Coming next post at Money Masters and Enslaved Taxpayers:
What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?

[michelle]

BYE BYE MR AMERICAN PIE
Thursday June 6, 1968
THE DAY THE MUSIC DIED

Robert Francis Kennedy

"Few of us will have the will to bend history itself,
but each of us can work to change a small portion of
events, and in the total of all those acts will be
written the history of this generation."

If the assassination of Bobby Kennedy didn't happen, he would have been the Democratic presidential nominee in 1968, he then would have faced the Republican presidential nominee, Richard Milhouse Nixon, in the November election. Bobby most likely would have won and been the next President of the United States. Since Bobby was opposed to the Viet Nam War ( police action ), this would have put an end to it in 1969 instead of 1975.

Right after delivering a rousing speech to an overflowing ballroom of exuberant campaign supporters thanking them for helping him win the big prize of the California Democratic primary for President, the junior Senator from New York State, Robert Francis Kennedy was shot at by an assassin four times within a couple of inches. He was wounded by three of the bullets with the fourth bullet going through his jacket. The exact time was 12:15am Wednesday morning June 5, 1968. The location was the kitchen pantry of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Bobby Kennedy died, the next day, Thursday June 6, 1968.

This death by assassination of Bobby Kennedy occurred only 63 days after the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis and also less then 5 years after his older brother, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, was assassinated in Dallas.

Bobby understood the needs of all Americans, especially the poorer discriminated southern blacks. Bobby realized the needlessness of the Viet Nam war and promised to end it if he became President. Bobby had the courage to run for President when he knew what would most likely happen to him.

I was 10 years old back then, the United States has never been the same since. The dreams of a better, more democratic life for all Americans has been brutally slain over and over and over again. We were then and we still are living in a fascistic country that is run by an evil military industrial corporate complex that assassinate leaders for not playing ball, their war machine ball.

"Fear not the path of truth
for the lack of people walking on it."

"It is from numberless diverse acts of courage
and belief that human history is shaped.
Each time a person stands up for an ideal,
or acts to improve the lot of others,
or strikes out against injustice,
he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope,
and crossing each other from a million
different centers of energy and daring,
those ripples build a current
which can sweep down the mightiest walls
of oppression and resistance."

From his speech on June 6, 1966 at the UN

[michelle]

The Living Flame of JFK
In memory of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy's life
and death, November 22, 1963
From: Michelle L. Zewe [and maybe, just maybe,
a bit from JFK himself!]
11/22/06

Who will console them now, Sean of the Gael?
Who lived in hope with thou, Sean of the Gael?
What lips will smile so gay, laughing their tears away,
Who now to lead the fray, Son of the Gael?
[Lines that Irish poet Dominic Behan set to the old melody Elieen Aruin which President Kennedy had especially liked.]

Our beloved President Kennedy was a man of profound concern and commitment. He came from a religion and race which had known discrimination and persecution. He possessed a historical imagination and saw the movement of events as a historian sees them, not as a morality play but as the interaction of men and values and institutions, in which each man's light is often dim but each must do the best they can.

President Kennedy had a vision of America and he awakened this vision in each of us. He saw this nation as a noble nation, rising above mean and ugly motives, subordinating private selfishness to public purpose, raising the standards of existence for all its citizens.

He could not understand the complacent rich who, so long as they had everything they needed for themselves, were content to starve schools, medical services and, social services for their less fortunate fellow citizens. The agony of Black Americans so troubled him that he committed himself to the battle for civil rights but not for political reasons; he knew it would lose him many more votes than it would gain him. He did this because it was necessary to keep the faith of American democracy and preserve the fabric of American life. He did this because he knew it was the right thing to do.

These things deeply troubled him, but what preoccupied him most was the peace of the world and the future of mankind. His historian's perspective made him see conflict not as a holy war but as a difficult and perilous struggle for adjustment and accommodation. He saw the world as a diverse world which had room for a great diversity of economic systems, of political creeds and, of philosophic faiths. He respected the identities of other nations and societies with their diverse values and traditions. Just as the possessing class of Americans had an obligation to the weak and defenseless, he also felt that possessing nations had an obligation to nations struggling to emerge from stagnation and want. He saw this not just as a moral obligation but as a social necessity. He once said,
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

He knew what nuclear war would mean, and he believed that the avoidance of such a war was in the common interest of mankind. This common interest, then and today, gives us a bridge across the dark abyss of our times. President Kennedy's deepest purpose was to strengthen that bridge against the storms of suspicion and fear, and to persuade his adversaries that, if each nation and people respected the reality of world diversity, if nations abandoned a messianic effort to remake the world in their own image, peace would be possible, and humanity would endure.

President Kennedy's mission was cut short with an assassin's bullet. But his leaving was a wakeup call, was it not? The country as a whole was not quite ready for the messages that were coming out at that time. You recall the flower children with their messages of Love and Peace, Dr Martian Luther King' s passionate pleas? The country as a whole needed to come together in recognition that change was needed and, for a brief time, many of us did come together. Oh I know that some of you went back to sleep after those years; however, you are wide awake now. And what is very, very wonderful is that the world is wide awake. And so if you shed tears on this day, let them be tears of joy, not of grief. The Living Flame at JFK's gravesite in Arlington National Cemetery is for all of us. That flame burns even now, but an even brighter flame is burning in all of your hearts. It has always been there. It is a flame that you can light for yourselves, and then assist others in that lighting.

Come together my global brothers and sisters, and join hands, as we join hearts, as we enter together even more into the bright and beautiful world that has come out of the darkness and fully into the light. It is the time. Let us go forth together and ask that question JFK challenged us with. We shall answer that question but we will take it further by realizing what we can do for the world.

On this 22nd day of November, 2006, we are here in company together, in oneness, and in absolute awe of who we are, and of what we can accomplish together. Never doubt that you have the power to do so, and never doubt that everything you do is of critical importance in this effort. Bless us all, as we bless each other. And so it is. Truth shines, and we are indeed that Truth, and we are indeed that Light shining. And we shall continue from here. There will be no setbacks upon our path. Liberty and Freedom for all are a fact. We live it, we support it, we extend it, and we enjoy it.

Yours in the Light,
Michelle
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LIGHT

The most divine place on Earth, where there is the most light
on this planet, exists in the Human mind within Human energy.
It's within the angelic part of humanity that wishes to show
itself, enable itself, and claim its divinity. There's no group of
bright, white angels who are standing by to take your hand and
whip you into heaven should you choose to go. No. Instead,
they're standing by in full regalia, willing to celebrate and press
upon you with their energies to let you know they're there. The
planet of free choice is like that. It's the Human who's enabled,
and it's the Human who will make the difference in the history
of the planet. It's the Human who has the responsibility for
dark and light, not an outside force that is vying for your soul.
But you've always known that, haven't you?

~Kryon, Book Ten, page 232~

[michelle]

Daddy Bush Attacks JFK "Conspiracy Theorists"
Former President triumphs Warren Commission at Ford's funeral; Are the Bush's breaking down?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 3, 2007

During his speech at yesterday's funeral service for Gerald Ford, former President George H.W. Bush bashed JFK "conspiracy theorists" and defended the Warren Commission report, another odd public outburst indicative of a crime family whose decades of misdeeds may finally be catching up with them.

"After a deluded gunman assassinated President Kennedy, our nation turned to Gerald Ford and a select handful of others to make sense of that madness," said Bush. "And the conspiracy theorists can say what they will, but the Warren Commission report will always have the final definitive say on this tragic matter. Why? Because Jerry Ford put his name on it and Jerry Ford’s word was always good."

The only thing Ford was good for was running defense for criminals when he pardoned the remorseless Richard Nixon and others after Watergate, allowing larcenous felons to walk free and leaving the legacy in place that it's OK to break the law if you are the President, a form of absolutism that has been keenly inherited by the current crop of crooks, including Dick Cheney who praised Ford for 'allowing the nation to heal' by protecting a cadre of organized crime gangsters.

Of course, all of this had nothing to do with liberals or conservatives, bricklayers or office clerks," writes Kurt Nimmo, "It had to do with breaking the law, with “dirty tricks,” snooping on political opponents, sabotaging Democratic presidential candidates, going after Daniel Ellsberg for the public service he provided by bringing the Pentagon Papers to light, ordering the FBI to investigate CBS News reporter Daniel Schorr, discussing the possibility of having newspaper columnist Jack Anderson assassinated, and other crimes (evading taxes, accepting illicit campaign contributions, ordering secret bombings, and harassing opponents with executive agencies, wiretaps, and break-ins), all of it culminating in Watergate."

There's no doubt that Ford, not unlike Saddam Hussein who died days after, knew where the bodies were buried and Bush was simply eulogizing his noble service in sweeping the JFK assassination under the rug, shielding Poppy himself from serious questions about his own involvement in events at Dealy Plaza.

As Wayne Madsen comments, "The elder Bush cannot really remember where he was on November 22, 1963. He later claimed he was in Tyler, Texas although there is evidence that he was checked into the Dallas Sheraton Hotel that day. Mr. Bush, the conspiracy theorists will continue to say what they will until you start telling the truth about Zapata, deMohrenshildt, Mongoose, New Orleans, and JM/WAVE."

Bush senior's outburst marks the second time in the same amount of months that he has felt the need to publicly attack those who would normally be relegated to the fringes of political discourse by big media consensus.

During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News in November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an adversarial and ugly climate, echoing the rhetoric of fellow Neo-Cons and the White House itself in trashing the reputation of the world wide web and the political blogosphere.

The fact that Bush is being pressured into bad mouthing so-called "conspiracy theorists" and bloggers proves that the chorus of dissent is beginning to make these cretins lose some sleep at night.

The Bush family as a whole is starting to exhibit some seriously offbeat behavior that suggests their decades of underhand chicanery, murders, cover-ups and scams are finally beginning to catch up with them.

Last month Bush senior burst into tears during a speech at his son Jeb's leadership forum. Jeb Bush himself recently declared that he "had no future" in politics. George W. Bush's obvious deteriorating mental acumen, characterized by a consistent supply of "Bushisms," has led several commentators to conclude that the current President is in the early stages of pre-senile dementia. The Bush daughters' behavior doesn't seem to be maturing with age either after U.S. Embassy officials strongly urged them to cut short last month's escapade in Argentina.

Are the Bush's breaking down? Is the fact that the President is less popular than Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and Satan combined finally starting to provoke pangs of conscience amongst the notorious crime family?

Do any of the Bush's even have a conscience?

Source: www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/030107daddybush.htm

Note: YouTube video available at source, within the text....M

[michelle]

Here's one we've all been waiting for....M

JFKII - The Bush Connection - Complete Documentary (1 hr 27 min.)

JFK2 - The sequel to Oliver Stone's JFK, you won't see in the cinema. A thoroughly documented criminal indictment establishing beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of George HW Bush as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John Kennedy. The evidence relies primarily on governement documents and public records. The center piece of the evidence is a memo entitled "Assassination of President John F. Kennedy", signed by J Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, 5 days after the assassination, which names Bush as a supervisor of CIA-trained assassins. Another FBI memo establishes Bush's presence in the Dallas area at the time of the assassination. These memos are corroborated extensively with details from Bush's own official history of his life (also known as JFK 2 Part 1).

Go To:
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4330031689287456187&q=jfkii

[michelle]

Kids' Letters to President Kennedy

Today, rather than center on that tragic event 44 years ago, I choose to be grateful that I experienced a life under the presidency of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. On this Thanksgiving Day, I am posting a selection of letters sent to JFK from pre-teen age youngsters across the United States. Letters to President Kennedy ranged from exciting bits of news about a pet hamster, dog, or cat to surprisingly adult observations concerning the then current political scene. Some of the young correspondents made unusual requests of their president; some asked for his advice about the problems of growing up. Some even gave their advice on how to handle his world problems.

These letters from children, writing so earnestly, asking for and giving advice may very well be the highest tribute a president can ever receive.

Yours In Service, Love and Gratitude,
Michelle
****************
President Kennedy

I am 13 years old and will be in the 9th grade. I am going into the army and am very interested in politics. I've no father or mother, brother or sister. My home is with 3 aunts and my grand-father.
If I could have my choice of a father it would be you.

Thankfully a citizen
Stewart M
****************************
Dear Mr. President,

I told my sister that I wanted to be the president of the United States in the future. When I said this she laughed and said I could not because to become President you have to know all the capitols of the states. Which I do not.
Do you have to know all of them before you can be president? Do you know them?

Yours truly,
Jane M
*************************
Dear Mister Kennedy

My name is Danny H. I am 10 years old and 5 feet 2 inches tall. I am a person who wanted you to become president. Before you became president just about all my room wanted Richard Nixon. But Craig N and I fixed that and this is how we did it we made up a speech and this is it.
If we were grown ups we would want a President with a good personality. We would want him to be smart and young so we could keep him for a long time. Also a man who plays games like football when he was a boy and thats what John F. Kennedy did and then we took a vote and you won by ten votes.
The reason we brought a game like football into the speech is because we think a person who would play games as a boy would be a good president.

Truly a Democrat
Danny H
******************
Dear Mr. President,

I have missed most of your speeches because I was studying my Boy Scout Handbook.
I would like a copy of your Speeches especially about the Berlin crisis.

Eugene E
**************************
My dear Mr. President

I am a 11 year old, listening to the 7:30 report on the news today September 18, 1961 heard there was to be a $15-20,000,000 aquarium put into the Capital buliding if all agree on it.
Think what we could do with $15,000,000 in this day and age.
With war practically staring us in our face we should invest our money in something worth while instead of some big fish bowl.
I agree with those who don't want the aquarium. I hope you agree with me.

Sincerely
John N
********************
Dear Mr. President,

I do not know if you got my last letter. I said in it that I want to be the first man to go to the moon in twelve more years. I know you may not be President then but if your brother Bobby Kennedy is give this letter to him.

Thank you
Stanley R
******************
Dear President Kennedy,

For a very long time I have been saving my spending money and just a little while ago I was able to buy a share of General Motors stock.
I planned to save more and add it and, when I get older work so that I can go to college and not have to ask help from Uncle Sam or anyone else. I am eleven year old now.
Is my share of General Motors which I have saved so hard to buy soon going to be worth nothing or maybe very little because so much of it has to be sold.
I pray for you. I hope you will help me and all the other people who work hard and save their money.

Lionel H
********************
Dear Mr. President

Ever since mom and dad saw you on TV they fight. Mom wants to make a shelter and dad says no because he just went back to work and theres to many bills to pay.
Mom crys all the time. They fight almost every day. If I were bigger I would buy them this one for their anniversary in February. Then they will be happy.

Joseph O
*********************
Dear Mr. President,

Do you wear a hat and like the White House and Washington? I want to buy my Daddy a hat like yours for his birthday. I love you a lot and your family. I think you are very handsome and so is my dad.

Betty S
Age 9
**********************
Dear Mr. Kennedy

I am sending a picture of A. Lincoln since you and Lincoln are Presidents in the 60's.
Lincoln---1861
Kennedy---1961

Andrew N
***********************
Dear Mr. Kennedy,

One of my greatest ambitions, next to going to heaven, is to shake hands with you.

Sincerely,
Harold D
************************
Dear President Kennedy,

I know how busy you are, but if you could get me to the White House I'll explain my plan for the Cubans.

Your Friend
Mickey M
*********************
Dear President Kennedy,

I had a girl cat named Princess and my Mother said we have to give it away because it had four kittens before and six in April. My Mother put Princess and one of her kittens losse in the country without letting me say goodbye to her. My Mother will not let me give her to a farm.
What would you do if you were my Mother?

Love,
Joan S
***********************
Dear President,

I have got a picture of you. How is your family. I think the baby is cute. How old is he now? It seems like such a long time. How is your family? I am eight year old now. I will be in the third grade. We have two dogs, two cats and may get another one and we are gouing to get a hamster for sure. My girlfriend is going to give me a hamster.
Thank you.

Sincerely
Lee S
************************
Dear President Kennedy,

I would like to have your opinion on the subject of animals. Do they have any brains.

Dorthy E
P.S. please answer
Thank you
**************************
Dear President Kennedy,

I would like to tell you that I think you are doing a great wonderful job for our country. You have already made great improvement for our country in the short time you have been President! My family and I would like to tell you that whatever decision you make about Berlin we know it will be the best for all of us. I know you need all the prayers you can get so here is a Spiritual Bouquet offered for you.
Masses, Rosaries, Our Father, Hail Marys
5 5 10 10

Thank you,
my gratitude and luck
Maria D
*********************
Dear Mr. Kennedy,

I have been wanting to write but have never got to it. I wanted to ask if a 11 year old boy could get a job washing dishes at the cafe to earn some money? The reason I asked you is because I need some money to pay for a tire for my bike. I am glad you were elected cause if Nixon was elected we would have a lot sooner war. Cause when Cruchef beat the table with his shoe Nixion just laught. And when you put your return address put it in your own handwriting. I will send a picture of me to show what I look like.

A good friend
Yours truly
Bill C
*************************
Dear President Kennedy

I am 8 years old.
I want to ask you a question.
Why do we have war?
Please answer my question.

Yours truly
Kenneth S
**********************
Dear Mr. President

I would like to write you a letter to thank you about the way you are taking care of everything about this war bussiness.

Thomas G
***********************
Dear President Kennedy

I am nine years old but I know more than most other nine year olds. I know what war, killing, and suffering are. I understand your problems.

Your pal,
Stephen L
**********************
Dear President Kennedy

My name is Kevin. I am 10 years old and I enjoy all sports mainly swimming.
What I wanted to say was I love my mother and my family and so do most people and I was wondering if you could try extra hard to stop the trouble that's brewing.

Yours truly
Kevin P
P.S. I think you make a swell president.
******************************
Dear Mr. Kennedy,

I am 10 years old. And was born after World War II. And, many, many more children were too. These children never live through a war. I know I haven't to. I also scare easy. Also your address to the nation scared me. Please don't have a war.

An American
Lloyd J
***************************
Dear Mr. President,

I am eleven years old and every night I worry. I worry about what will happen tomorrow, not so much as tomorrow, but as the future.
What will be left of this wonderful world in ten years if someone presses the button? What will be left of you and your family? All I'm asking for is, please think before you press the button, please.

Sincerely yours
Roger N

[michelle]

President John F. Kennedy's inaugural address, January 20th 1961

Rather than post my annual tribute to President Kennedy on the anniversary of his assassination, I waited until the following day. I did not wish to remember this being and his leadership in sorrow.

JFK once said, Our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal. His 1961 inaugural address was given to all humans across our planet and today I offer it to ALL once again.

This human, who lead the United States, was a creator who worked to weave a new dream for humanity and Earth; for he remembered his link to Source. He spoke the language of Light and Oneness. In these times, we too are awakening to our nature as creators.

What is a human creator? Let me explain with a little help from another who is ahead of me on the path returning home:

WHAT IS A CREATOR?

What is the creator? The creator is one that takes responsibility for their own creation. Your creation is your body and life dream as a human. Your creation is also the Earth Mother as a part of the consensus reality that you participate within. Humans as consciousness not only enter the compressed sound, tone and movement of a particular creation that they may inhabit at the request of the creator, but also take responsibility for the entire creation and helping to manage it from within the experience. Humans therefore are just as responsible as creators for their own bodies as any other body that may exist within the creation. The body you exist within is just as important as the entire consensus known as Earth; and those that are human consciousness from within the Tao understand this from within.

What you perceive outward and in the world dream now are great non-creator dances within the human experience. The non-creator dances cause humans to destroy the consensus rather than help it sustain itself or evolve. Non-creator dances cause humans to destroy one another through warfare or other kingdoms through consumption of flesh. Non-creator dances cause humans to pollute and over harvest the Earth Mother to a point that she struggles to regenerate. This is non-creator behavior in action; and something that those who are projections from the Tao are here to correct somehow within yourself and then within the human dream as this is your task.

Mila long ago looked at all the problems in the human dream and spoke to her Tao within, "How can I possibly correct all of this? It seems like an infinite mess and the opposite of all that is my truth within." The Tao responded "It is all smoke and mirrors. As you correct what is mirrored outside of you within yourself, the outside will self correct. Worry not about the outside, simply focus upon the inside and forgive where you and your inheritance have participated in the lawlessness you perceive as outwardly expressed in others. As you restore the law within your biology, everything outside of yourself will begin to self heal."
From: RESTORING THE STATE OF A CREATOR UNTO HUMAN FORM
www.ascendpress.org/Community/TaoHeart/Creator.htm

President Kennedy was a creator who, to the best of his ability at the time, wove a new dream for humanity and Earth. It is now our time to weave the dream, to heal ourselves and so heal the world, one person at a time.

Michelle
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future....JFK

PS: I choose the color Turquoise for JFK's Inaugural Address. This was not done randomly. Please refer to the Language of Light section for a new unity based language that fosters ascension. Notice the symbols and their meanings which consist of the color turquoise singularly and in combination with other colors, here: www.ascendpress.org/language-of-light/LOLsingle.html
You can learn more about the Language of Light, here: www.ascendpress.org/LOLmain.html
If you feel a resonance to the above and the following, perhaps you may wish to visit The Spiritual School of Ascension, at:
www.ascendpress.org/About.html
Those of you who feel this way and deeply within your heart will be few and far between. Mostly you have been surrounded by other humans in this life that are not a part of this project, and perhaps you have felt separate and different somehow. You also most likely have a lot of wisdom within and perhaps found yourself counseling or healing others in the dance of life, even if this is not your main preoccupation. Perhaps you have felt deeply that there is something really important to fulfill upon, but have not known what it is or what to do in order to allow such a dream to unfold.


Videos 1&2: JFK Inaugural Address
Text Below

JFK Inaugural Address 1 of 2


JFK Inaugural Address 2 of 2

From: PaddyIrishMan2
Added: October 29, 2006

President John F. Kennedy's inaugural address, January 20th 1961.

Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom — symbolising an end, as well as a beginning — signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans — born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage — and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

This much we pledge and more.

To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do — for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.

To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom — and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge — to convert our good words into good deeds — in a new alliance for progress — to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbours know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.

To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support — to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective — to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak — and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course — both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.
So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.

Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belabouring those problems which divide us.

Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms — and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.

Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth the command of Isaiah — to "undo the heavy burdens ... and to let the oppressed go free."

And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavour, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved.
All this will not be finished in the first one hundred days. Nor will it be finished in the first one thousand days, nor in the life of this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet.

But let us begin.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our cause. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.
Now the trumpet summons us again — not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are — but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation" — a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.

Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility — I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavour will light our country and all who serve it — and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.